Justice Ramendra Jain dismissed the petitioner's writ petition as infructuous after a cancellation report was submitted by authorities for the relevant discharge order dated 22.05.2015.
The instant petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-35439 of 2018 DECIDED ON: 21.02.2019
RAMESHO DEVI
...PETITIONER...
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
...RESPONDENTS...
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: Mr. Arun Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. R.K. Makkar, Sr. DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Sushil Kamboj, Advocate, for respondents No.4 and 5. *****
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Learned State counsel filing reply by way of affidavit of Mr. Kushal Singh, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Indri submits that instant petition has rendered infructuous, in view of the fact that cancellation report has been submitted against DDR No.008, dated 22.05.2015, Police Station Indri, District Karnal.
In view of the above, instant petition is dismissed as having
been rendered infructuous.
21.02.2019 (RAMENDRA JAIN) sonika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
SONIKA 2019.02.22 11:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
RAMESHO DEVI
STATE OF HARYANA
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
