Sharanjit Singh @ Vicky v. State of Punjab
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What did the court decide?
Order dated 11.10.2018 passed by this Court regarding anticipatory bail is made absolute.
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
Order dated 11.10.2018 passed by this Court regarding anticipatory bail is made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-41454 of 2018 Date of Decision: 22.02.2019
Sharanjit Singh @ Vicky
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present:Mr. S.P. Khera, Advocate, for Ms. Rishma Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Harpreet Multani, AAG, Punjab.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Through this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. prayer has been made for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.27 dated 26.04.2016 registered under Sections 406, 420, 120-B IPC and Section 24 of the Immigration Act, 1983 at Police Station Bilga, Jalandhar Rural.
Learned State counsel, on instructions from the Investigating Officer, submits that petitioner has joined the investigation and is no more required for interrogation.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, order dated 11.10.2018 passed by this Court is made absolute.
Disposed of accordingly.
(RAMENDRA JAIN)
February 22, 2019 JUDGE R.S. Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RAVINDER SINGH 2019.02.26 09:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Sharanjit Singh @ Vicky
State of Punjab
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court