The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of COCP No. 953 of 2016. The petitioner sought withdrawal with liberty to impugn a speaking order passed by the writ court, which the state counsel stated had been complied with.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to impugn the speaking order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No. 953 of 2016
Date of decision : 18.01.2017
Ajmer Singh Gill
....Petitioner
V/s
Ravi Bhagat & ors.
....Respondents
BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. N.K. Manchanda, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. V. Ramswaroop, Addl. A.G. Punjab.
RAJAN GUPTA J.
Learned State counsel submits that order passed by writ court
has been complied with. A speaking order, Annexure R1 has been passed.
In view of above, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
he may be allowed to withdraw this petition with liberty to impugn the speaking order.
Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
January 18, 2017 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
Ajay Kumar 2017.01.18 16:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Ajmer Singh Gill
Ravi Bhagat & ors.
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
