Petitioner withdrew the writ petition after being allowed temporary employment as a Tubewell Operator and payment of arrears. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No. 2312 of 2016
Date of decision : 18.01.2017
Ishlam Mohamad
....Petitioner
V/s
Shiksha Rani & ors.
....Respondents
BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. D.S. Adlakha, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sushil Gautam, DAG Haryana.
Mr. R.S. Budhwar, Advocate for respondent no. 1. Mr. R.S. Rana, Advocate for Mr. R.S. Manhas, Advocate for respondents no. 2 & 3.
RAJAN GUPTA J.
Pursuant to order dated 08.1.2016, learned State counsel submits that petitioner has been allowed to work on the post of Tubewell Operator as a temporary employee. He has also been paid arrears of the salary.
In view of above, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
he may be allowed to withdraw this petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
January 18, 2017 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
Ajay Kumar 2017.01.21 11:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Ishlam Mohamad
Shiksha Rani
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
