Writ petition challenging decision on supplementary examinations. Court held grievance redressed by respondent No.2's submissions dismissing petition without further directions.
Rule discharged and petition dismissed without further direction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-2483-2016 (O & M) Date of decision: 16.01.2017
Mata Sundri Educational Welfare So. (Regd.)
…. Petitioner
V/s
Vikas Pratap, IAS and anr.
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. Sardavinder Goyal, Advocate, Mr. Nitin Kant Setia, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. V. Ramswaroop, Addl.A.G., Punjab.
Mr. J.S. Rattu, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Rajan Gupta, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 submits that students, who did not clear the exam can appear for supplementary examination in terms of notifications dated 05.07.2004 and 11.03.2014 by paying fee/late fee. According to him, supplementary examinations are, thus, to be held in March, 2017.
In view of the above, grievance of the petitioners has been redressed. No further direction is necessary.
Dismissed.
Rule is hereby discharged.
(RAJAN GUPTA)
January 16, 2017 sukhpreet
JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Sukhpreet Kaur 2017.01.20 15:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Mata Sundri Educational Welfare So. (Regd.)
Vikas Pratap, IAS
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
