The court dismissed the contempt petition as infructuous because the underlying appeal had been dismissed by a co-ordinate bench, rendering the present proceedings unnecessary.
The contempt petition was dismissed and the matter was not disposed of on merits as it became infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-2260-2015 (O & M) Date of decision: 16.01.2017
Sat Pal Singh
…. Petitioner
V/s
Tejinder Mohan and ors.
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Ms. Sushma Sharma, Advocate, for Mr. R.K. Rana, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Meena Bansal, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2.
Mr. C.B. Goel, Advocate.
Rajan Gupta, J. (Oral)
Reply filed on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2 in court today, is taken on record.
Learned counsel appearing for respondents No.1 and 2 submits that present petition has been rendered infructuous as the appeal (RSA-23682015) has been dismissed by a co-ordinate Bench.
Aforesaid contention remains uncotrovereted.
Under the circumstances, the contempt petition is dismissed.
January 16, 2017 sukhpreet
(RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Sukhpreet Kaur 2017.01.20 15:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Sat Pal Singh
Tejinder Mohan
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
