The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed a contempt petition after the respondents submitted that the order of the writ court had been complied with via a speaking order, rendering no cause of action.
Contempt petition dismissed and rule discharged upon respondents' compliance submission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No. 803 of 2015
Date of decision : 18.01.2017
Deepika & anr.
....Petitioners
V/s
V.M. Solanki & anr.
....Respondents
BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: None for the petitioners.
Ms. Ruchita Garg, Advocate for the respondents.
RAJAN GUPTA J.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that order passed by writ court has been complied with. A speaking order, Annexure A-1 has been passed by the appropriate authority.
In view of stand taken by respondents, it appears that no cause of action survives in this contempt petition. Same is hereby dismissed. Rule is discharged.
Needless to observe that petitioners shall be at liberty to impugn the order passed by the authority.
January 18, 2017 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
Ajay Kumar 2017.01.18 16:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Deepika & anr.
V.M. Solanki & anr.
RAJAN GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
