The Court disposed of the matter by referring the case to CWP No.7988 of 2013 titled Kuldeep Singh & Anr. vs. State of Punjab & Ors. decided on the same date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.8137 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: 21.05.2013
Harminder Singh & Anr. . . . . Petitioners
VS.
State of Punjab & Ors. . . . . Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE R.P. NAGRATH
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present: Mr. SS Sarwara, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Manoj Bajaj, Addl. AG Punjab Ms. Reeta Kohli, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4
SURYA KANT J. (ORAL)
For orders, see CWP No.7988 of 2013 titled as Kuldeep
Singh & Anr. vs. State of Punjab & Ors. of even date.
(SURYA KANT) Judge
21.05.2013
vishal shonkar
(R.P. NAGRATH) Judge
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Kuldeep Singh & Anr. vs. State of Punjab & Ors.Followed¶18
CWP No.7988 of 2013
Harminder Singh
State of Punjab
Surya Kant
R.P. NAGRATH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
