Disposed

Daljit Singh v. State of Punjab & Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC22 May 2013CWP/1175/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted a request to refer the case regarding alternative site allotment to a Committee constituted in a connected writ petition. The court gave the petitioner liberty to submit claims and allowed respondents to counter via written submissions, directing a timeline for Committee consideration.

What did the court decide?

Referral to Committee; liberty to submit claims in 14 days; liberty to respondents to submit counters; Committee to determine within 4 months.

Daljit Singh Vs State of Punjab & Ors. — Land Acquisition | Punjab & Haryana HC (2013)

¶1

-1-

¶2

CM No. 6750 of 2013 and CWP No. 1175 of 2011

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CM No. 6750 of 2013 and CWP No. 1175 of 2011 Date of decision: 22.05.2013

Daljit Singh

..... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others

¶9

..... Respondents

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.P. NAGRATH

¶11

PRESENT: Mr. Mohit Jaggi, Advocate for the applicant-petitioner.

¶12

Mr. Manoj Bajaj, Addl. A.G. Punjab.

¶13

Mr. Harit Sharma, Advocate for GMADA.

¶14

SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL)

¶15

The prayer in this application is to refer this case along with other connected cases to the Committee constituted by this Court vide order dated 17.10.2012, passed in a bunch of writ petitions including CWP No. 12433 of 2011 (Nasib Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others).

¶16

Suffice it would be to notice that the petitioner is the resident of village Lambian, Tehsil Kharar, District Mohali and he is seeking allotment of alternative site/residential plot in terms of Special Rehabilitation Policy dated 1.6.2001, which pertains to the rehabilitation

¶17

CM No. 6750 of 2013 and CWP No. 1175 of 2011 -2-

¶18

of residents of village Lambian.

¶19

Vide our order dated 17.10.2012, passed in the above-stated bunch of writ petitions, we constituted a Committee comprising (i) the Secretary-cum-Legal Remembrancer to Government of Punjab (Chairman); (ii) Chief Administrator, GMADA (Member) and (iii) the Additional Deputy Commissioner (General), SAS Nagar, Mohali (Member), to determine the claim of similarly placed residents of village Lambian. It is stated that the said Committee is still seized with the matter. Keeping these facts in view, we dispose of this application as well as the main petition with liberty to the petitioner to submit his claim before the above-mentioned Committee within a period of two weeks. The respondents shall also be at liberty to counter the petitioner's claim by way of their written submissions. The Committee shall then consider and determine the claim of the petitioner in the light of guidelines/directions already made in the main order dated 17.10.2012. The Committee shall consider the claim of the petitioner within a period of four months from the date of submission of claim.

¶20

The parties shall appear before the Committee on 3.6.2013 at

¶21

11.00 a.m.

¶22

	( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE
May 22, 2013 rishu	( R.P. NAGRATH ) JUDGE

Daljit Singh v. State of Punjab & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Daljit Singh v. State of Punjab & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harminder Singh and Another Vs State of Punjab and Others

Ludhiana Improvement Trust Vs Harbhajan Kaur & Ors.

Balbir Singh Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Balwinder Kaur & Ors. Vs State of Punjab &Ors.

Pawandeep Singh Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Gurkirat Singh Vs State of Punjab and Ors.