Petition disposed as withdrawn because settlement under the OTS was approved by the bank, leaving no cause for continuation.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 10910 of 2013
Date of decision: 20.05.2013
Gobinder Kaur and others
..... Petitioners
Versus
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal and others
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.P. NAGRATH
PRESENT: Mr. I.P. Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.
SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the settlement under the OTS has been approved by the bank, leaving no cause for the petitioners to pursue with this petition.
As prayed for, dismissed as withdrawn.
| ( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE |
|
|---|---|
| May 20, 2013 rishu |
( R.P. NAGRATH ) JUDGE |
Gobinder Kaur and others
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal and others
SURYA KANT
R.P. NAGRATH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
