Petitioner sought direction for allotment of a plot under Oustee Quota without prior request. Court allowed withdrawal with liberty to approach competent authority and dismissed petition.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach competent authority for plot allotment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 7118 of 2013 DATE OF DECISION : 04.04.2013
Bhupinder Singh
.... PETITIONER
Versus
State of Haryana and others
..... RESPONDENTS
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH
Present: Mr. Abhishek Sethi, Advocate, for the petitioner.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. ( Oral )
The petitioner has filed this petition for issuing direction to the respondents to allot him plot under the Oustee Quota, without first making request for the same to the competent authority. In view of this fact, learned counsel states that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to first approach the competent authority for allotment of a plot in his favour under the Oustee Quota.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. If the aforesaid prayer of the petitioner is not accepted by the authorities, it will be open to him to approach this court.
( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE
April 04, 2013 ( AMOL RATTAN SINGH ) ndj JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether petitioner can be directed to allot a plot under Oustee Quota without requesting it first.
Bhupinder Singh
State of Haryana
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
AMOL RATTAN SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
