Unreadable judgment text. Pendency and service regularization made CWP infructuous; disposed accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
����
����������������������������������������
��������������
CWP No.4055 of 2005 Date of Decision: 20.12.2013
Pawan Kumar �Petitioner
Versus
Chaudhary Charan Singh, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar
...Respondent
������������������������������������������������
Present:- Mr. Rakesh Nagpal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Saurabh Gulia, Advocate, for the respondent.
������������������������� ����!
Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, fairly states that since during the pendency of the writ petition, services of the petitioner have been regularized vide order dated 15.04.2006 w.e.f. 01.10.2003, instant writ petition has rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such.
Ordered accordingly.
December 20, 2013 �������
���������������������! ���������������
Vandana 2013.12.21 10:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
