Dismissed
Uma Rani v. Central Administrative Tribunal Chd & Ors.
Punjab & Haryana HCCWP/3977/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P. No. 3977 of 2013 Date of Decision: April 05, 2013
Uma Rani
... Petititioner
Versus
The Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH
Present: Ms. Maninder, Advocate, for the petitioner.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, states that
the petitioner wants to withdraw the petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
April 05, 2013 ( AMOL RATTAN SINGH ) vkg JUDGE
Uma Rani
The Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh
Satish Kumar Mittal
Amol Rattan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court