CWP dismissed for want of prosecution as no party appeared on behalf of the petitioners on the last date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.12231 of 1991 Date of decision:20.05.2013
Saudagar Ram & others .....Petitioners
Versus
The State of Haryana & others
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr.Kamal Sehgal, Addl.A.G., Haryana.
Ajay Kumar Mittal J.(Oral)
On the last date of hearing, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners. Even today, there is no appearance.
Dismissed for want of prosecution.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
20.05.2013 (G.S.SANDHAWALIA) sailesh JUDGE
Saudagar Ram & others
The State of Haryana & others
Ajay Kumar Mittal
G.S. Sandhwalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
