Writ petition challenging land acquisition proceedings was withdrawn by petitioners with liberty to approach competent authorities for other remedies available under law.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail other remedies available under law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
::1::
CWP No.10722 of 2013 (O & M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.10722 of 2013 (O & M) Date of Decision: May 17, 2013
Suraj Bhan and others
....Petitioners
Versus
Chief Administrator Haryana Urban Development Authority, Panchkula and others
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr.J.S. Dahiya, Advocate, for the petitioners.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.
The challenge in the present petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is to acquisition proceedings initiated by the respondents to acquire the houses of the petitioners being constructed prior to the date of issuance of notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the Act') and in respect of which award (Annexure P-14) has been announced in 2005.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
(G.S. SANDHAWALIA) JUDGE
May 17, 2013 sukhpreet
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging land acquisition proceedings may be withdrawn with liberty to seek other remedies.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Suraj Bhan and others
Chief Administrator Haryana Urban Development Authority and others
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
G.S. SANDHAWALIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
