The petitioner challenged notifications issued under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a representation.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 10804 of 2013 Date of Decision:- May 20, 2013
Nishi Bhargava
..............PETITIONER(S)
vs.
State of Haryana
...........RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present:Mr. Sarbjit Singh Khaira, Advocate, for the petitioner.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
(Ajay Kumar Mittal) Judge 20.05.2013 (G.S. Sandhawalia) shivani Judge
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nishi Bhargava
State of Haryana
Ajay Kumar Mittal
G. S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
