The High Court allowed the petitioner's application for quashing of an FIR registered under various sections of IPC and the Essential Commodities Act. Upon request from the petitioner's counsel to withdraw the petition with a reservation to file one later, the court dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No.M-38536 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 04, 2013.
Shobha Rani
..........PETITIONER(s).
VERSUS
State of Punjab and another
........RESPONDENT(s).
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present: Mr. Deepak Agnihotri, Advocate for the petitioner.
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
CRM No.73221 of 2012
Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
CRM M-38536 of 2012
The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing of FIR No.100 dated 20.10.2012 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 379, 420, 120-B of Indian Penal Code and Section 7 of Essential Commodities Act, 1955 registered at Police Station Chabbewal, District Hoshiarpur alongwith all consequential proceedings arising therefrom.
Learned counsel for the petitioner requests for withdrawal of this petition on the plea that he would file another one at appropriate stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
May 04, 2013.
( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) JUDGE
Sachin M.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petition for quashing of FIR under Section 482 CrPC stands allowed or dismissed as withdrawn.
Whether the petition is maintainable on facts and law regarding offences under IPC sections 379, 420, 120-B and Essential Commodities Act 7.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Shobha Rani
State of Punjab
RAM CHAND GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
