Allowed

Jeevan Lal and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC6 May 2013CRM-M/14592/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order disposed of a petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The court directed the Senior Superintendent of Police, Hoshiarpur, to take appropriate action on an application made by the petitioners for their protection without examining the merits of their claim regarding their marriage.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent no.2, Senior Superintendent of Police, Hoshiarpur, to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application dated 3.5.2013.

Jeevan Lal and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and… — Service and Employment | Punjab & Haryana HC (2013)

¶1

-1-

¶2

Crl.M.No.M-14592 of 2013(O&M)

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

¶4

Crl.M.No.M-14592 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision: May 6, 2013

¶5

Jeevan Lal and another

¶6

.....Petitioners

¶7

¶8

State of Punjab and others

¶9

......Respondents

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA

¶11

Present: Petitioners in person with Mr.Ramneek Vasudeva, Advocate.

¶12

.....

¶13

RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)

¶14

The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for issuance of direction to respondent nos.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent nos.4 to 8. Heard.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners will be satisfied if respondent no.2, i.e., Senior Superintendent of Police, Hoshiarpur, is directed to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, dated 3.5.2013, Annexure P5, already made to him by the petitioners.

¶16

As per averments made in the petition both the petitioners are major. Date of birth of petitioner no.1-Jeevan Lal as per copy of passport, Annexure P1, is 2.4.1984, and date of birth of petitioner No.2- Inderjit Kumari, as per copy of Middle Standard Examination Certificate, Annexure P2, is 24.4.1980. They got married on 30.4.2013, as per marriage certificate, Annexure P3. Photographs of the marriage are Annexure P4.

¶17

In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioners, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.2, i.e.,Senior Superintendent of Police, Hoshiarpur, to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, dated 3.5.2013, Annexure P5, already stated to have been moved to him by the petitioners.

¶18

Crl.M.No.M-14592 of 2013(O&M)

¶19

-2-

¶20

However, it is made clear that this order will be having no effect on the validity of alleged marriage of petitioners and also on any other civil or criminal proceedings instituted against petitioner no.1 as per law.

¶21

6.5.2013

¶22

meenu

¶23

(Ram Chand Gupta) Judge

Jeevan Lal and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jeevan Lal and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Balwant Singh Vs Shiv Narain

Gurbachan Kaur Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Shobha Rani Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Joginder Kumar @ Kala Vs State of Haryana

Dogender Vs State of Haryana

Jagdev Phogat Vs Haryana State