Uttam Chand v. K C Bhagat
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No. 2581 of 2012 (O&M)
Uttam Chand
.. Petitioner
versus
K. C. Bhagat .. Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
Present: Mr. Saurabh Kaushik, Advocate for Mr. Arvind Kashyap, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. APS Mann, Additional Advocate General, Punjab.
Rajesh Bindal, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer made in the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
(Rajesh Bindal) Judge
21.3.2013 vs
Uttam Chand
K. C. Bhagat
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court