Narinder Singh v. Surinder Singh
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge order dismissing a writ petition as infructuous because the order passed by this Court had been complied with.
Single judge order dismissing a writ petition as infructuous because the order passed by this Court had been complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.17 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision : 21.3.2013
Narinder Singh
..Petitioner.
Vs.
Surinder Singh
..Respondent.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mr. J.S.Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner.
RAJESH BINDAL, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that prayer made in the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous as the order passed by this Court has been complied with.
Dismissed as infructuous.
( Rajesh Bindal ) Judge
21.3.2013 Meenu
Narinder Singh
Surinder Singh
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court