The bench allowed an application for anticipatory bail in a criminal complaint involving Sections 498-A and 506 IPC, ordering the petitioners' release on bail subject to the satisfaction of the trial court.
Petitioners are ordered to be released on bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Crl. Misc.No.M-24590 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision: 6.11.2012
Lal Chand and others ...Petitioners
Versus
Rajbala .Respondents
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice K.C.PURI
Present: Mr. J.V.Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kuldeep Khandelwal, Advocate for the respondent.
K.C.Puri,J.(Oral)
Petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in Criminal Complaint No. 225-IC/39-IC dated 2.12.2011 filed under Sections 323/406/498-A/341/500/511/506 IPC within the jurisdiction of P.S. City Charkhi Dadri District Bhiwani.
Mr. Kuldeep Khandelwal, Advocate has appeared
on behalf of the complainant.
It is a complaint case.
Petitioners are ordered to be released on bail to the
satisfaction of the trial Court.
November 6,2012 (K.C.PURI) nk JUDGE
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to anticipatory bail under the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Whether the complainant's objection to the application for anticipatory bail was addressed by the petitioner's counsel.
Lal Chand and others
Rajbala
K.C. Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
