The petitioner challenged the authority of police and damaged public property. The court rejected the petition as no ground for anticipatory bail existed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM NO. M-32874 OF 2012(O&M) DECIDED ON : 05.11.2012
Hardwari Lal
...Petitioner
versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI
Present : Mr. P. K. Ganga, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Anupam Sharma, AAG, Haryana.
K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL)
As per allegations of the prosecution, three police officials were given beatings and their vehicle was damaged by the petitioner and others.
The petitioner has challenged the authority of police and has damaged the public property.
So,no ground for grant of anticipatory bail is made
out.
Dismissed.
NOVEMBER 05, 2012 (K. C. PURI) shalini JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner alleged to have beaten police officials and damaged property.
Hardwari Lal
State of Haryana
K. C. PURI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
