Surinder Singh Alias Shinda v. State of Punjab
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM NO. M-30415 OF 2012(O&M) DECIDED ON : 05.11.2012
Surinder Singh
...Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI
Present : Mr. K. D. S. Sodhi, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Sandeep Chhabra, DAG, Punjab.
K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL)
Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Jaspal Singh, has stated at the bar that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is not required for further investigation. The weapon of offence has also been recovered.
So, in these circumstances, the order dated
28.09.2012 passed by this Court, is made absolute.
Disposed of.
NOVEMBER 05, 2012 shalini
(K. C. PURI) JUDGE
Surinder Singh
State of Punjab
K. C. PURI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court