Petitioner sought bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in a matrimonial FIR. Counsel moved for withdrawal of the petition, which was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl.M.No.M-19040 of 2012(O&M) Date of Decision: July 4, 2012
Smt.Rama
.....Petitioner
v.
The State of Haryana
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present: Mr.Rajneesh Chadwal Advocate for the petitioner.
.....
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
Crl.M.No.37003 of 2012
Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Crl.M.No.M-19040 of 2012
The present petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is for grant of bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.549, dated 17.8.2011, under Sections 304-B, 498A, 120-B, 34, 406 IPC, registered at Police Station City Jind, Haryana.
Learned counsel for the petitioner requests for withdrawal of this petition, at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn, at this stage.
4 .7.2012
meenu
(Ram Chand Gupta) Judge
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Rama
The State of Haryana
Ram Chand Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
