Disposed
Sonu v. State of Haryana
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/16512/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-16512 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision: August 14, 2012.
Sonu
... Petitioner(s)
v.
State of Haryana
... Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH
Present: None for the petitioner.
Shri Amit Goyal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana.
Paramjeet Singh, J. (Oral):
Present petition has been filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner in a case arising out of FIR No.75, dated 19.5.2011, registered at Police Station 379, 420, 411 of the Indian Penal Code and 66, 66-B, 66-C and 66-D of the Information Technology Act.
Learned Counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Birbal, PS Kalayat, submits that this petition has been rendered infructuous as both the accused, nominated in the FIR, have been convicted by the trial court.
In view of the above, present petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.
August 14, 2012. kadyan
[ Paramjeet Singh ] Judge
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sonu
State of Haryana
Paramjeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court