Petitioner sought regular bail in a murder case where all accused were already acquitted. Court found petition infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-10691 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision: 13.08.2012
Rattna
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH
Present: - Mr. Aman Vashisht, Advocate, for Mr. Salil Bali, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sidharth Sarup, DAG, Haryana.
PARAMJEET SINGH, J. (ORAL)
This is a petition filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of concession of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.4 dated 1.2.2012 under Sections 306 IPC, registered at Police Station G.R.P. Kurukshetra.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that all the accused have been acquitted.
Learned State counsel, after seeking instructions from SI Suresh Kumar, does not dispute this fact.
In view of the above, this petition has been rendered infructuous.
Disposed of accordingly.
(Paramjeet Singh) Judge
August 13, 2012 R.S.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rattna
State of Haryana
Paramjeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
