A single-paragraph order disposes of a petition for quashing a summons under Section 319 Cr.P.C. by holding the petition infructuous following the petitioners' acquittal in the undertrial stage. The court did not engage in detailed legal analysis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-14482 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision: August 14, 2012.
Surender @ Sinder and another
... Petitioner(s)
v.
State of Haryana and another
... Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH
Present: Shri Baljinder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Shri Amit Goyal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana.
None for respondent No.2.
Paramjeet Singh, J. (Oral):
Present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing order dated 3.4.2012 passed by the trial court on an application filed by respondent No.2 whereby the petitioners have been summoned to face trial under Section 319 Cr.P.C.
Learned Counsel for the State, on instructions from SI Ved Parkash, submits that the petitioners have been acquitted of the charge framed against them and as such, this petition has been rendered infructuous.
Disposed of as such.
August 14, 2012. kadyan
[ Paramjeet Singh ] Judge
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Surender @ Sinder and another
State of Haryana
another
Paramjeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
