Ashok v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
M-15035 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE…
M-15035 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl. Misc. No. M-15035 of 2011 1
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No. M-15035 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 13.7.2011
Ashok ...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. B.S. Saroha, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Garg, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana.
Rajan Gupta, J. (oral)
Learned State counsel submits that according to instructions received by him, all prosecution witnesses have been examined and statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. has also been recorded.
In view of above, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he be allowed to withdraw the present petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(RAJAN GUPTA)
JUDGE
13.7.2011 'rajpal'
Ashok
The State of Haryana
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court