The Supreme Court of India disposed of the writ petition as infructuous due to averments in the preliminary objections in the reply, without substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 965 of 1987
Date of decision: 20.08.2010
Gurinderpal Jit Singh and another
….. PETITIONERS
VERSUS
State of Punjab and another
….. RESPONDENTS
CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr. Surinder Kapoor, Addl. A.G. Punjab.
JASBIR SINGH, J. (ORAL)
In view of the averments made in para-1 of the preliminary objections in the reply, this writ petition has become infructuous.
Disposed of accordingly.
( JASBIR SINGH ) JUDGE
( AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) JUDGE
August 20, 2010 pj
Gurinderpal Jit Singh
another
State of Punjab
another
Jasbir Singh
Augustine George Masih
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
