A petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for quashing of FIR was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No.M-16333 of 2010
Date of Decision: 19.08.2010
Inderjit Singh @ Inder
....Petitioner
Versus
Union Territory, Chandigarh and another
...Respondents
CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
Present:Mr. Munish Puri, Advocate for Mr. Hemant Saini, Advocate for the petitioner.
**
NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL)
This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for quashing of
FIR No.219 dated 04.11.2009 registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 473, 379, 411 and 120-B IPC at Police Station Sector 31, Chandigarh and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(NIRMALJIT KAUR) JUDGE
19.08.2010 gurpreet
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Inderjit Singh @ Inder
Union Territory, Chandigarh
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
