The petitioner filed for anticipatory bail under Sections 148, 149, 323, 452, 506, and 427 of the IPC. The State counsel informed the Court that the petitioner had joined the investigation. Consequently, the order previously made was declared absolute and the petition was allowed.
Order dated 19.8.2010 declared absolute; petition allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. M. No.24065-M of 2010 Date of Decision:15.10.2010
Sanny
.... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
.... Respondent
CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
Present: Mr. Hari Om Attri, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Priyanka Dalal, A.A.G. Haryana.
1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2.To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral)
The present petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.227 dated 21.5.2010 registered under Sections 148,149,323,452,506,427 of IPC at Police Station Civil Lines, Hisar.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State on instructions from ASI Amar Singh states that the petitioner has since joined the investigation.
Accordingly, order dated 19.8.2010 is made absolute and the petition is allowed as such.
15.10.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail petition is maintainable given the petitioner's active participation in the investigation.
Sanny
State of Haryana
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
