Subhash Chander Siger and Another v. State of Haryana and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
C.W.P. No. 8462 of 2009
DATE OF DECISION : 09.07.2009
Subhash Chander Siger and another
.... PETITIONERS
Versus
State of Haryana and others
..... RESPONDENTS
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present: Mr. Veneet Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral )
After arguing for some time, counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to move the authorities for payment of the retrenchment compensation, which was not paid to them at the time of their retrenchment, in light of the order dated February 10, 2004, passed by this court in CWP No. 9186 of 2002, titled as Joi Ram and others versus State of Haryana and others.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
July 09, 2009 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE
Subhash Chander Siger and another
State of Haryana and others
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court