The present writ petition seeking summons under Article 226 has been declared infructuous due to the withdrawal of recruitment advertisements by the respondents and dismissed.
None
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P. No. 17861 of 2008 Decided on : 23-04-2009
Ashwani Kumar Kaushik
....Petitioner
VERSUS
Managing Director, UHBVN, Panchkula and another.
....Respondents
CORAM:-HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL .
Present:Mr. Jagdeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Parveen Gupta, Advocate for the respondents.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J (Oral).
Learned counsel for the respondents states that since the advertisements (Annexure P-1 and Annexure P-2) issued by respondent No.1 for recruiting Assistant Engineers (Electrical/Civil), have been withdrawn, therefore, this petition has become infructuous.
In view of the statement made by the counsel for the respondents, this writ petition is rendered infructuous.
Dismissed as infructuous.
23rd April, 2009. (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) Monika JUDGE
Ashwani Kumar Kaushik
Managing Director, UHBVN, Panchkula
Another
Satish Kumar Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
