The High Court dismissed the withdrawal petition of the petitioner, allowing him liberty to file a reply to the subsequently issued charge sheet.
Liberty to file reply to charge sheet.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
C.W.P. No. 2860 of 2008
DATE OF DECISION : 22.04.2009
Satnam Singh
.... PETITIONER
Versus
Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar and others
..... RESPONDENTS
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present: Mr. P.K. Garg, Advocate, for the petitioner.
None for respondent No.1.
Ms. Puneet Kaur Sekhon, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral )
After arguing for some time, counsel for the petitioner states that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioner to file reply to the charge sheet, which has been issued to him during the pendency of this petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
April 22, 2009 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE
Satnam Singh
Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar
Satish Kumar Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
