Dismissed
Raj Kumar Sachdeva v. State of Punjab
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/10752/2009
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner's anticipatory bail petition not pressed for grant. Dismissed.
What the court decided
AI extract
Petitioner's anticipatory bail petition not pressed for grant. Dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. -M No. 10752 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : 23.04.2009
Raj Kumar Sachdeva alias Raju Sachdeva
.... PETITIONER
Versus
State of Punjab
..... RESPONDENT
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present: Ms. G.K. Mann, Advocate, for the petitioner.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral )
After arguing for some time, counsel for the petitioner states that she does not want to press this petition for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 115 dated 9.6.2002 under Sections 364/148/149 IPC read with Sections 25/27/54/59 of Arms Act, registered at Police Station Lambi,
District Muktsar.
Dismissed as not pressed.
April 23, 2009 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE
Raj Kumar Sachdeva
State of Punjab
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court