Allowed

Lalbabu Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC27 Aug 2024CR. MISC./58896/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application before the Patna High Court, the petitioner sought release in a case involving kidnapping and abduction under sections of the IPC and POCSO Act. The court considered allegations of kidnapping for marriage due to complexion issues and the petitioner's clean antecedents, eventually granting bail subject to bond conditions and cooperation with the trial.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount subject to cooperation in trial.

Lalbabu Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58896 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-151 Year-2024 Thana- RAMNAGAR District- West Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Lalbabu Chaudhary S/o Prayag Chaudhary R/o Sabuni, PS- Ramnagar, District- West champaran

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

M W/o Suresh Chaudhary R/o Pipra Bazar, P.S. - Ramnagar, Distt. - West Champaran

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

======================================================

¶11

Appearance :

¶12

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

¶13

ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 27-08-2024

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.

¶16

In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail

¶17

in connection with Ramnagar P.S. Case No. 151 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the POCSO Act.

¶18

The marriage of the victim was fixed with the petitioner but the mother of the petitioner was not ready to solemnize the marriage as the petitioner was not a person of fair complexion. As per allegation, the petitioner along with other accused persons have kidnapped the informant’s daughter for the purpose of marriage.

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58896 of 2024(2) dt.27-08-2024 2/2

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the F.I.R shows itself that the marriage of the informant’s daughter was to be solemnized with the petitioner but she was not ready. As a matter of fact, the alleged victim went with the petitioner herself but thereafter in pressure of her mother, she supported the prosecution story in her statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. The petitioner is under custody since 08.05.2024.

¶21

On the other hand, learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶22

Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances especially the clean antecedents of the petitioner, let the petitioner above-named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, VII cum Special Judge (POCSO), Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Ramnagar P.S. Case No. 151 of 2024, subject to the following condition:-

¶23

The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court.

¶24

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

Lalbabu Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lalbabu Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lalu Bhagat @ Lal Saheb Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ghosh Sahani @ Ghocha Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Arbind Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Kumar Sah @ Manoj Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Rakesh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar