Dismissed

Brajbhushan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC9 Nov 2022CWJC/1816/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought revocation of an unauthorized suspension. The court disposed of the writ petition on the basis of submissions, noting the petition was infructuous as suspension was revoked, while granting liberty to act against the official.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to petitioner to act against the individual official who passed the unauthorized suspension order.

Brajbhushan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1816 of 2020

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Brajbhushan Kumar Son of Gupteshwar Sharma, resident of MohallaProfessor Colony, P.S. Jehanabad, District- Jehanabad.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Department of Health, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Director in-Chief Health Services, Bihar, Patna.

¶8

¶9

The District Magistrate, Patna.

¶10

The Civil Surgeon-Cum Chief Medical Officer, Patna.

¶11

The District Vector Born Disease Control Officer, Patna.

¶12

The Deputy Superintendent Sub Divisional Hospital, Masaurhi, Patna.

¶13

The In-Charge Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre Maner, Patna.

¶14

... ... Respondent/s

¶15

======================================================

¶16

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shankar Kumar,Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Nagendra Pd. Yadav (SC 23) ======================================================

¶17

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER

¶18

3 09-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

¶20

petitioner had come before this Court for revocation of his suspension which was done by the authority without having any power to do so. He further submits that now his suspension stands revoked as so far as this writ petition is concerned, it has become infructuous. However, he may be given liberty to act against the particular individual, if the petitioner so desire, in view of the fact that the official was not having the authority to suspend him.

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.1816 of 2020(3) dt.09-11-2022 2/2

¶22

In view of the submissions put forward by the learned

¶23

counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶24

It goes without saying that the petitioner has always

¶25

liberty to take steps in accordance with law.

¶26

(Rajiv Roy, J)

¶27

Jagdish/Neha/-

¶28

Brajbhushan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Brajbhushan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Dinesh Chandra Sinha Vs The Rajendra Agricultural University

Bablu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Parmanand Prasad, Vs The State of Bihar through the Secretary of Food and Consumer Protection

Dr. Sunil Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Dr. Captain Dev Nandan Prasad Sinha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Janaki Devi, Vs The State of Bihar