Oral order holding a contempt application infructuous and disposed as the underlying order was complied with.
Contempt application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.256 of 2021 In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2994 of 2020
======================================================
Parmanand Prasad, Son of Sri Jageshwar Prasad, resident of Village-Barorah, P.S.-Guraru, District-Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Suresh Kumar Ishwar,Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Arvind Ujjwal, SC 4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER
Mr. Suresh Kumar Ishwar fairly submits in the
presence of learned counsel for the opposite party that the order stands complied with and as such, the contempt application has become infructuous.
In view of the aforesaid submission, the contempt application is dismissed as infructuous.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Jagdish/Neha/-
U
Parmanand Prasad
State of Bihar through the Secretary of Food and Consumer Protection
Avishekh Singh
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
