The high court held the writ petition infructuous as the petitioner's grievance had been redressed, leading to dismissal of the matter without substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13090 of 2018
======================================================
Dr. Sunil Kumar Singh S/o Late Shyamprit Singh R/o 301, Sukh Smiriti Apartment, Mohalla-Sheikhpura, P.S.- Shastrinagar, District- Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rakesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Ajay Bihari Sinha - Ga8 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and as such the matter has become infructuous.
In view of the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/-
U
Dr. Sunil Kumar Singh
The State Of Bihar
The Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Bihar
The Joint Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Bihar
The Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Khagaria
The Officer Incharge Medical Officer, Primary Health Center Beldaur, Khagaria
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
