The High Court at Patna, in an oral order, dismissed a contempt application as infructuous after the Respondents submitted that the earlier order had been complied with.
Contempt application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4073 of 2018
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2278 of 2012
======================================================
Dr. Dinesh Chandra Sinha Son of Late Kamleshwari Prasad Verma, Resident of 12 Green Park Darling Colony, New Area Morahabadi, Post Office-Ranchi University, Police Station Bariyatu, District Ranchi.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anand Kumar Ojha,Advocate Mr. Ashok Kumar Karn, Advocate Mrs. Priya Gupta, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Chandra Mohan Singh,Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER
Mrs. Priya Gupta fairly submits in the presence of learned counsel for the opposite party that the order stands complied with and as such, the contempt application has become infructuous.
In view of the aforesaid submission, the contempt application is dismissed as infructuous.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Jagdish/Neha/- U
Dr. Dinesh Chandra Sinha
Rajendra Agricultural University
R.C. Srivastava
Umesh Kr. Verma
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
