Allowed
Ranjan Kumar Pandey @ Ranjan Pandey v. The State of Bihar
Patna HCCR. MISC./30805/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30805 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2019 Thana- KACCHWA District- Rohtas
======================================================
RANJAN KUMAR PANDEY @ RANJAN PANDEY S/o Shiv Kumar Pandey Resident of Village- Navadih, P.S.- Karakat, District- Rohtas, At present posted in Panchayat Danwar, Gramin Aawas Sahayak (Post) under Karakat Panchayat.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vitesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER
9 22-11-2021
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Kachhawa P.S. Case No. 48 of 2019 for the offence registered under Sections 406, 409, 420, 468 and 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that witnesses examined during investigation whose statement have been recorded in paragraph nos. 17 and 18 have categorically stated that no payment was made to the petitioner. They have stated that the beneficiaries have received
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30805 of 2020(9) dt.22-11-2021 2/2
the payment and are constructing their house under the “Prime Minister Awas Yojna. It is further submitted that similarly situated co-accused persons have been granted bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 19.06.2020 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 76668 of 2019. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.
Learned counsel for the State has opposes the application for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Bikramganj, Rohtas in connection with Kachhawa P.S. Case No. 48 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)
Jagdish/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to a grant of anticipatory bail in the facts and circumstances of the case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ranjan Kumar Pandey @ Ranjan Pandey
The State of Bihar
Prashant Kumar
Sunil Kumar Panwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court