Partly allowed

Mahendra Rai v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Nov 2021CR. MISC./27369/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar allowed the withdrawal of anticipatory bail petitions filed by some petitioners in PS Case 186 of 2020 Paroo Muzaffarpur and granted anticipatory bail to the remaining petitioners subject to furnishing of bonds.

What did the court decide?

Permission accorded to withdraw petitions of petitioners Nos. 1 and 2; anticipatory bail granted to remaining petitioners with bond of Rs. 10,000 each.

Mahendra Rai Vs The State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27369 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-186 Year-2020 Thana- PAROO District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Mahendra Rai Son of Yodha Rai Resident of Village- Bhikhanpura, P.S.Paroo, District- Muzaffarpur.

¶5

Yogendra Rai Son of Yodha Rai Resident of Village- Bhikhanpura, P.S.Paroo, District- Muzaffarpur.

¶6

Harendra Rai Son of Yodha Rai Resident of Village- Bhikhanpura, P.S.Paroo, District- Muzaffarpur.

¶7

Yodha Rai Son of Sakhi Rai Resident of Village- Bhikhanpura, P.S.- Paroo, District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ram Babu Rai For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pronoti Singh ======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR

¶14

ORAL ORDER

¶15

2 18-11-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

¶16

learned APP for the State.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioners is expected

¶18

to honour his undertaking given in the instant case for depositing the requisite court fee and to remove the defects as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office.

¶19

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in

¶20

a case registered for the offences punishable under

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27369 of 2021(2) dt.18-11-2021 2/3

¶22

Sections 341, 323, 324, 379, 308, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶23

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 namely Mahendra Rai and Yogendra Rai have been arrested. Hence, he seeks permission to withdraw the petitions with regard to petitioner Nos. 1 and 2.

¶24

Permission is accorded.

¶25

Accordingly, the petitions with regard to

¶26

petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 are permitted to be withdrawn.

¶27

It is alleged that petitioners and others armed

¶28

with lathi, danda, farsa and iron rod came at the door of the informant and abused and attacked on the informant and his family members. They also snatched gold ornaments and cash.

¶29

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. The injuries have been found to be simple in nature. A statement has been made in para

¶30

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27369 of 2021(2) dt.18-11-2021 3/3

¶31

3 of the petition that petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

¶32

In the facts and circumstance of the case, let the petitioners, above named, except petitioner Nos. 1 and 2, in the event of their arrest or surrender before

¶33

the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousands) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III-cum-Sub Judge, West, Muzaffarpur in connection with Paroo P.S. Case No. 186 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶34

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶35

Shageer/-

¶36

U T

Mahendra Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahendra Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Binod Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Suresh Sharma @ Suresh Kumar Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Dilip Ram @ Dilip Kumar Rajvanshi Vs The State of Bihar

Amrendra @ Biren Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Dipak Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Deepak Kumar Vs the State of Bihar