The High Court at Patna allowed a miscellaneous application seeking restoration of Civil Revision No. 166 of 2016, which had been dismissed for default due to failure to comply with a previous order. The petition was disposed of by restoring the case.
The application for restoration is allowed and Civil Revision No. 166 of 2016 restored to its original file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.538 of 2017 In
CIVIL REVISION No.166 of 2016
======================================================
Bibi Sulema Khatoon
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
Abdul Rashid
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Gopal Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER
This application has been filed for restoration of Civil Revision No. 166 of 2016, which has been dismissed for default due to non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 16.01.2017.
For sufficient reasons mentioned in the restoration application, the same is allowed and the Civil Revision No. 166 of 2016 is restored to its original file.
This application stands disposed of.
(S. Kumar, J)
Rajiv/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Civil Revision No. 166 of 2016 can be restored after being dismissed for default due to non-compliance of a peremptory order.
Bibi Sulema Khatoon
Abdul Rashid
S. Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
