Miscellaneous Appeal No.223 of 2016 was dismissed for default because the appellant failed to comply with a peremptory order dated 05.02.2019 by not serving required documents to the respondent's counsel within the stipulated time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.223 of 2016
======================================================
Chandan Prasad Son of Late Mishri Sah Resident of Mohalla - Ward No. 12, Nagar Parishad, Shashtrinagar, P.S. Madhepura Town and District Madhepura
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
The Union Of India Through The General Manager N.e. Railway Gorakhpur
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Amar Nath Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER
By peremptory order dated 05.02.2019, learned
counsel for the appellant was directed to serve a copy of memo of appeal and limitation petition to the learned counsel for the respondent within four weeks from the date of peremptory order. However, the same was not complied by the learned counsel for the appellant and, accordingly, Miscellaneous Appeal No. 223 of 2016 stood dismissed for default on 06.03.2019 for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 05.02.2019.
The Miscellaneous Appeal stood dismissed for default on 06.03.2019.
(S. Kumar, J)
manoj/-
U
Chandan Prasad
The Union Of India
S. Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
