This court dismissed Miscellaneous Appeal No. 332 of 2016 for default as the appellant failed to substitute the writ petition with the memo of appeal as per a peremptory order dated 22.01.2019.
Dismissing Memorial Appeal No. 332 of 2016 for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.332 of 2016
======================================================
Rahul Kumar and Anr
... ... Appellant/s
Versus Dr. Bishwa Mohan Singh and Ors ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Sanjay Parasmani For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER
7 09-04-2019
By peremptory order dated 22.01.2019, learned counsel for the appellant was permitted to substitute the writ petition by a memo of appeal within two weeks. However, the same was not substituted by the learned counsel for the appellant and, accordingly, Miscellaneous Appeal No. 332 of 2016 stood dismissed for default on 05.02.2019 for noncompliance of peremptory order dated 22.01.2019.
The Miscellaneous Appeal stood dismissed for default on 05.02.2019.
(S. Kumar, J)
manoj/-
U
Rahul Kumar and Anr
Dr. Bishwa Mohan Singh and Ors
S. Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
