This oral order dismisses an appeal by default due to the appellants' failure to appear and comply with a deadline for filing requisites for service of notice.
Appeal stands dismissed for default for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 11.03.2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.340 of 2014
======================================================
Hari Prasad Verma and Ors.
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
Prem Ranjan Gupta and Anr.
... ... Respondent/s
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER
8 10-04-2019 Yesterday none had appeared on behalf of the appellants when the case was called out.
Today also there is no representation on behalf of the appellants.
On 11.03.2019, this Court had directed appellants to file requisites for issuance of notice upon respondent nos. 1 to 2 by both processes, however, the same has not been complied as yet and the last date for filing the requisites was 08.04.2019.
In view of the above, this appeal stands dismissed for default on 08.04.2019 for non compliance of the peremptory order dated 11.03.2019.
(S. Kumar, J)
ranjan/-
U
Hari Prasad Verma and Ors.
Prem Ranjan Gupta and Anr.
S. Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
