Ramesh Singh v. Jagdish Sinha
Case brief
What is this about?
Miscellaneous Appeal dismissed for default as appellant failed to comply with a peremptory order granting time to remove defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter.
What did the court decide?
Miscellaneous Appeal No. 333 of 2016 was dismissed for default of non-compliance with a peremptory order.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.333 of 2016
======================================================
Ramesh Singh, Son of late Sukhram Singh, Resident of Mohalla- Mainpura, P.S. patliputra Town, District- Patna.
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
Jagdish Sinha, (Defendant no.7) S/O Late Shiv Narayan Singh, resident of village Nigampur, P.S.- Janipur, District- Patna.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Navin Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER
6 09-04-2019
By peremptory order dated 22.01.2019, learned counsel for the appellant was granted two weeks time to remove the defect(s) as pointed out by the Stamp Reporter. However, the same was not removed by the learned counsel for the appellant and, accordingly, Miscellaneous Appeal No. 333 of 2016 stood dismissed for default on 05.02.2019 for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 22.01.2019.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ramesh Singh
- respondent
Jagdish Sinha
Coram
S. Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court