Disposed

Munna Gaddi and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC21 Nov 2019CWJC/17830/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of two connected writ petitions concerning illegal encroachment on government land. Following a dispute over pending appeals by private respondents, the court directed the District Collector to determine the status of encroachment within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to District Collector to dispose of pending appeal within four weeks and remove illegal encroachment if still existing.

Munna Gaddi and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Land Acquisition | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20602 of 2014

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Md Kalim Gaddi S/o Md. Ashgar Gaddi resident of village - Nautanba Pachamba, P.S. Shikarpur, District - West Champaran

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

¶5

The State Of Bihar

¶6

The Director, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna - 1

¶8

The Director, Rural Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna - 1

¶9

The Collector, West Champaran at Bettiah

¶10

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Narkatiyaganj Anchal, District - West Champaran

¶11

The Circle Officer, Narkatiyaganj Anchal, District - West Champaran

¶12

The Block Development Officer, Narkatiyaganj Anchal, District - West Champaran

¶13

Jajul Gaddi son of Late Daroga Gaddi

¶14

Ali Mohammad Gaddi son of Late Ishar Gaddi

¶15

Firoj Alam Gaddi son of Ali Mohammad Gaddi

¶16

Jilani Gaddi son of Late Bahadur Gaddi

¶17

Yunush Gaddi son of Late Bahadur Gaddi

¶18

Abbas Gaddi son of Ali Hasan Gaddi

¶19

Neshar Gaddi son of Ali Hasan Gaddi

¶20

Nurain Gaddi son of Ali Mohammad Gaddi The Respondent No. 9 to 16 are the residents of village - Nautanba Pachamba, Post - Maniyari, P.S. Shikarpur, Anchal - Narkatiyaganj, District - West Champaran

¶21

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17830 of 2016 ====================================================== Munna Gaddi and Ors ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar and Ors ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 20602 of 2014)

¶22

Patna High Court CWJC No.20602 of 2014(9) dt.21-11-2019 2/3

¶23

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Chandra Mauli Chaurasia For the Respondent/s : Mr.Aag13-A.K.Chaudhary (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17830 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mritunjay Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr.Subhash Chandra Yadav, GP-15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶24

9 21-11-2019

¶25

First case has been filed for directing the respondent

¶26

authorities to remove the illegal encroachment made by the private respondents over Khesra No. 917 appertaining to Khata No. 186 which is a Gair Majarua Aam land situated at MauzaNautanwa Pachamba, P.S. Shikarpur, Anchal-Narkatiyaganj, District-West Champaran.

¶27

The second writ petition has been primarily filed by the private respondents of the first writ petition challenging the order passed by the Circle Officer. However, the learned counsel for the petitioners of the second case submits that they have filed an appeal before the District Collector, West Champaran.

¶28

At this juncture, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent State submits that most of the illegal encroachments have been removed, however, the learned counsel appearing in the first case disputes the said position existing as on facts.

¶29

It appears that it might be possible that the encroachments made by the private respondents in the first case

¶30

Patna High Court CWJC No.20602 of 2014(9) dt.21-11-2019 3/3

¶31

may not have been removed in view of the pendency of the appeal by the said private respondents of the first case who happen to be the petitioners in the second case.

¶32

I deem it fit and proper to dispose of the present writ petition with a direction to the District Collector, West Champaran to dispose off the appeal, if any, filed by the petitioners of the second case within a period of four weeks from today and thereafter take appropriate action in accordance with law and in case it is found that illegal encroachment is still existing on the public land, the same be removed forthwith.

¶33

The writ petitions stand disposed of on the aforesaid

¶34

terms.

¶35

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶36

S.Sb/-

¶37

Munna Gaddi and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Munna Gaddi and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bigan Yadav @ Rajkumar Vs the State of Bihar

Raushan Sharma @ Raushan Kumar Sharma @ Pandit Vs the State of Bihar

Munna Kumar @ Munna Khauf Vs the State of Bihar

Mithilesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Piyaria Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Praveer Vs The State of Bihar