Quashed

Md. Anzarul Haque v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC2 Jul 2019CR. REV./494/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal revision, the High Court of Patna directed that a maintenance order dated 02.07.2019, which erroneously recorded a monthly payment of Rs. 2500/- as a lump sum, be read to reflect the intended monthly obligation to the wife and son.

What did the court decide?

The second last paragraph of the order dated 02.07.2019 is to be read as directing payment of Rs. 2500/- per month for maintenance of the wife and son.

Md. Anzarul Haque Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Maintenance and Alimony | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL REVISION No.494 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-1111 Thana- District-

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Anzarul Haque son of Ajimuddin resident of Village Kazi Basti Patasari, P.S. Thakurganj, District Kishanganj.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Bihar

¶8

Noor Afshan wife of Md. Anzarul Haque

¶9

Nafis Ahmad daughter of Md. Anzarul Haque, resident of Village Kazi Basti Patasari, P.S. Thakurganj, District Kishanganj. At present case both Moulana Narul Absar At Puratan Palli, P.S. Eslampur, District Uttar Dinajpur West Bangal.

¶10

... ... Respondent/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Praveen Kumar Agrawal For the Respondent/s : Mr.T.P.Mandal App ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶13

7 23-07-2019 Heard both sides.

¶14

This case has been listed today under the heading

¶15

“To Be Mentioned” at the instance of opposite party nos. 2 and

¶16

¶17

It has been submitted by learned counsel for opposite party nos. 3 and 4, that in the second last paragraph of order 02.07.2019, this court has directed that “ in the meantime, the petitioner is directed to pay Rs. 2500/- per month to the opposite party no. 2 towards her maintenance and for maintenance of her son ” but the same has inadvertently been recorded in the order as “ the petitioner is directed to pay Rs.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.494 of 2016(7) dt.23-07-2019 2/2

¶19

2500/- as lump sum amount to opposite party no. 2 for her maintenance and maintenance of her son ”.

¶20

Having perused the order dated 02.07.2019, from which it appears that learned counsel for opposite party nos. 2 and 3 is right in her submission.

¶21

In such view of the matter, let second last paragraph of order dated 02.07.2019 be read as “ In the meantime, the petitioner is directed to pay Rs. 2500/- per month to the opposite party no. 2 towards her maintenance and for maintenance of her son.”

¶22

Let a copy of this order be communicated to the concerned court below forthwith.

¶23

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶24

sunilkumar/-

¶25

U T

Md. Anzarul Haque v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Anzarul Haque v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukesh Raj @ Santosh Sao Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Manish Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Triloki Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Abdullah Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Md. Ishaque Vs The State of Bihar

Ramesh Prasad @ Ramesh Gendalal Prasad Vs the State of Bihar