Disposed

Mukesh Raj @ Santosh Sao v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC1 Jul 2019CR. MISC./732/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of an anticipatory bail application in a domestic dispute involving allegations of cruelty, assault, and dowry demands. The petitioner was directed to surrender by July 10, 2019, for provisional bail coupled with an attempt at reconciliation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to surrender by 10.07.2019; lower court to grant provisional bail for six months and attempt reconciliation.

Mukesh Raj @ Santosh Sao Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.732 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-43 Year-2010 Thana- NALANDA District- Nalanda

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Mukesh Raj @ Santosh Sao, Son of Saryug Saw, Resident of Village - Giriyak, P.S. Giriyak District - Nalanda.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Rinku Devi, Wife of Mukesh Rai @ Santosh Sao, Resident of Village - Giriyak, P.S. Giriyak District - Nalanda. A/P daughter of Ashok Sao d/o Begampur PS and Distt. Nalanda.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance :

¶11

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rabindra Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Uday Chand Prasad, APP ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶13

6 01-07-2019

¶14

This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Nalanda P.S. Case No.43 of 2010, disclosing offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 498A, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶15

Allegation against the petitioner is of demand of motorcycle and one colour T.V., for which, subjected with cruelty and harassment and assaulted the informant.

¶16

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that as a matter of fact, she is not ready to reside with the petitioner. She has married with another person and in spite of that petitioner is still ready to keep her with dignity and care, if she is ready.

¶17

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.732 of 2019(6) dt.01-07-2019 2/3

¶19

In the present case, notice was issued to the opposite party no.2 but the same was received with the report that opposite party no.2 does not reside at the given address and thereafter, again notice was sent through her lawyer but in spite of that opposite party no.2 has not appeared.

¶20

In such view of the matter, let the petitioner, above named, surrender before the court below by 10.07.2019 and on surrender, the learned court below shall grant provisional bail to the petitioner for a period of six months and try to make attempt for reconciliation between the parties, after issuing notice to the opposite party no.2 and after six months considering the conduct of both the parties, the learned court below pass the order in confirming the bail bonds of the petitioner.

¶21

It is needless to say that if in spite of that notice issued to the opposite party no.2 by the learned court below and information to her lawyer, if she will not appear before the learned court below, the learned court below shall confirm the bail bonds of the petitioner.

¶22

With the aforesaid observations, this application stands disposed of.

¶23

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶24

Sunil Shukla/-

¶25

U T

¶26

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.732 of 2019(6) dt.01-07-2019 3/3

Mukesh Raj @ Santosh Sao v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh Raj @ Santosh Sao v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Salamuddin Ansari @ Salamuddin Ansari Vs The State of Bihar and Anr.

Jagdish Pd. Singh @ Jagdish Prasad Singh and Ors. Vs The State of Bihar and Anr.

Ranjay Kumar Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar

Triloki Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Mahabir Chaudhary Vs the State of Bihar and Anr.

Niraj Kumar Singh and Anr. Vs The State of Bihar and Anr.